Victorian Bohemian Robert Louis Stevenson wrote the best-selling novella The Strange Case of Doctor Jekyll and Mr. Hyde as an indictment of societal hypocrisy. Its success earned his son financial independence. He wrote both drafts in 1886 in six days at 10,000 words a day.
Critics and lay readers differ as to its meaning, but most agree that the “double” is a major theme: a staid, reputable gentleman-physican wants very badly to be ‘bad.” But how can he accomplish this? In Victorian England a good reputation is one’s most valuable treasure. He won’t risk it without assurance of impunity. Being a doctor, he turns to what he knows best: drugs. There is his method of escape from morality and his disguise.
Readers also expand the story and ponder whether Steenson is making the statement that within all men such a dualism exists. Or, they wonder, do separate personalities reside within the same man — the flesh and spirit debate. Many critics claim that the Jekyll is good, that he struggles and loses the battle of illicit desire. But Hyde (pun) doesn’t even resemble Jekyll: he’s deformed, ugly, bestial. He delights in pure evil as depicted with the trampling of the small child, synbol of Victorian purity. Jekyll isn’t struggling, he’s indulging making sure that he doesn’t get caught, clever man that he is.
Whichever the case, Stevenson’s view of life is intriguing. And antithetical to typical 19th-century views. This excerpt from Stevenson’s “A Christmas Sermon” (1888) expresses a summary of his view of life and death. He suffered from “the ‘English disease,” tuberculosis, and this surely affected his views.
To look back upon the past year, and see how little we have striven and to what small purpose, and how often we have been cowardly and hung back, or temerarious and rushed unwisely in; and how every day and all day long we have transgressed the law of kindness; – it may seem a paradox, but in the bitterness of these discoveries, a certain consolation resides. Life is not designed to minister to a man’t vanity. He goes upon his long business most of the time with a hanging head, and all the time like a blind child.
Full of rewards and pleasures as it is-so that to see the day break or the moon rise, or to meet a friend, or to hear the dinner-call when he is hungry, fills him with surprising joys – this world is yet for him no abiding city. Friendships fall through, health fails, weariness assails him; year after year, he must thumb the hardly varying record of his own weakness and folly.
It is a friendly process of detachment. When the time comes that he should go, there need be few illusions left about himself. Here lies one who meant well, tried a little, failed much: – surely that may be his epitaph, of which he need not be ashamed. Nor will he complain at the summons which calls a defeated soldier from the field: defeated, ay, if were Paul or Marcus Aurelius! – but if there is still one inch of fight in his old spirit, undishonored. The faith which sustained him in his life-long blindness and life-long disappointment will scarce even be required in this last formality of laying down his arms. Give him a march with his old bones; there, out of the glorious sun-colored earth, out of the day and the dust and the ecstasy – there goes another Faithful Failure!
Other versions: Though often criticized for being too “Freudian,” the Spencer Tracey (Victor fleming, director) version features early special effects as Jekyll morphs on screen. Julia Roberts plays Jekyll’s (John Malkovich) housekeeper who knows what she shouldn’t in Mary Reilly. The Broadway musical featured David Hasselhoff — of Baywatch.
Who owns your books?
July 21, 2009 · 3 Comments
Is anyone else appalled byAmazon’s electronic retrieval and removal of customers’ Kindle ebook purchases? I own yellowed, paperback copies of the texts in questions: Animal Farm, 1984, and Atlas Shrugged. Talk about irony. I didn’t have to sign an agreement statement when I made my purchases. With electronic texts, apparently the retail company views its texts as a “service.” (Read about how Apple checks IPhone applications. )
The bookselling giant had its reasons. Well enough. But those of us who have indeed read Orwell and Rand smell a e-rat or at least yet another potential means for invasion of liberty, monitoring of reading material being a telling starting point with totalitarian regimes.
Here’s the article from Slate, where you can also find a link to info. on the book by Harvard law professor, Jonathan Zittrain, The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It.
Categories: English matters · Social commentary
Tagged: Amazon, censorship, Kindle, literature, reading, Slate, technology